全球生物多样性低于“安全水平”

Levels of global biodiversity loss may negatively impact on ecosystem¹ function and the sustainability of human societies, according to UCL-led research. "This is the first time we've quantified the effect of habitat loss on biodiversity globally in such detail and we've found that across most of the world biodiversity loss is no longer within the safe limit suggested by ecologists" explained lead researcher, Dr Tim Newbold from UCL and previously² at UNEP-WCMC.

 

"We know biodiversity loss affects ecosystem function but how it does this is not entirely³ clear. What we do know is that in many parts of the world, we are approaching a situation where human intervention⁴ might be needed to sustain ecosystem function." 

 

The team found that grasslands⁵, savannas⁶ and shrublands were most affected⁷ by biodiversity loss, followed closely by many of the world's forests and woodlands. They say the ability of biodiversity in these areas to support key ecosystem functions such as growth of living organisms and nutrient⁸ cycling has become increasingly uncertain.

 

The study, published today in Science, led by researchers from UCL, the Natural History Museum and UNEP-WCMC, found that levels of biodiversity loss are so high that if left unchecked, they could undermine efforts towards long-term sustainable development.

 

For 58.1% of the world's land surface, which is home to 71.4% of the global population, the level of biodiversity loss is substantial enough to question the ability of ecosystems⁹ to support human societies. The loss is due to changes in land use and puts levels of biodiversity beyond the 'safe limit' recently proposed by the planetary boundaries - an international framework that defines a safe operating space for humanity. 

 

"It's worrying that land use has already pushed biodiversity below the level proposed as a safe limit," said Professor Andy Purvis of the Natural History Museum, London, who also worked on the study. 

 

"Decision-makers worry a lot about economic recessions, but an ecological¹⁰ recession could have even worse consequences - and the biodiversity damage we've had means we're at risk of that happening. Until and unless we can bring biodiversity back up, we're playing ecological roulette."

分享到：