GMAT考试写作指导：Issue写作范文三六

36.        The relationship between teamwork and individual strength, energy, and
commitment is complex; whether they operate in a complementary or antagonistic²
manner depends on: (1) the goals toward which the traits are directed, (2) the degree of
emphasis on teamwork, and (3) the job of the individual within an organization.
      A person's ability to work effectively in a team is not in consistent per se with
personal strength, energy, and commitment. If exercised in a self-serving manngr—for
example, through pilfering³ or back stabbing—these traits can operate against the
organization. Conversely, if directed toward the firm's goals, these traits can motivate
other team members, thereby⁴ advancing common goals. World War II generals Patton
and Rommel understood this point and knew how to bring out the best individual
qualities in their troops, while at the same time instilling⁵ a strong sense of team and
common purpose.
        Nevertheless, over-emphasizing teamwork can be counterproductive for an
organization. A successful team requires both natural leaders and natural followers⁶;
otherwise, a team will accomplish little. Undue⁷ emphasis on teamwork may quell⁸
initiative among natural leaders, thereby thwarting⁹ team goals. Also, teamwork can be
overemphasized with a commissioned sales force of highly competitive and autonomic
individuals. Overemphasis on teamwork here might stifle¹⁰ healthy competition, thereby
defeating a firm's objectives. In other organizational areas, however, teamwork is
critical. For example, a product-development team must progress in lock-step fashion
toward common goals, such as meeting a rollout deadline.
      In sum, individual strength, commitment, and energy can complement¹ a strong
team approach; as long as individual autonomy is not undermined, all can operate in a
synergistic manner to achieve an organization's goals.