(单词翻译:单击)
The relatives of more than 300 people killed in the devastating1 L’Aquila earthquake asked for £43 million in compensation from seven experts who are accused of manslaughter in failing to give adequate warning about the disaster.
意大利七位地震专家因未能准确预报拉奎拉地区发生的强震而面临过失杀人罪指控。超过300人在地震中遇难。日前,遇难者亲属要求七位专家赔偿4300万英镑损失。
A court in L’Aquila, the mountain city which was devastated2 by the 6.3 magnitude quake on April 6, 2009, admitted 70 individuals and organisations as injured parties in the trial, including the city’s council.
The six prominent seismologists(地震学家) and a senior public official are accused of not issuing sufficient warning over the likelihood of a major tremor3 at an emergency meeting six days before the earthquake hit.
The seven defendants4 face charges of manslaughter(过失杀人) and unintentionally causing injury, which if proven by the court, could result in prison sentences of up to 15 years.
The decision to prosecute5 the experts has caused outrage6 in the scientific world, with Italian and international colleagues saying it is impossible to accurately7 predict an earthquake.
The Seismological Society of America has described the trial as an unprecedented8 legal attack on science.
Only one of the seven defendants was in court — Bernardo De Bernardinis, the then deputy head of Italy’s Civil Protection agency.
“I felt that it was important to be here because this is my home, and also to underline the professionalism and competence9(能力,胜任) of other public officials. I’m from Abruzzo, I owe it to the people of the city,” he said.
The prosecution10 alleges11 that after the experts held an emergency meeting on March 31, 2009, they gave the public only an “approximate, generic12 and ineffective assessment13 of seismic14 activity risks as well as incomplete, imprecise and contradictory15 information.”
The experts, part of Italy’s Great Risks commission, issued a memo16 that day in which they concluded that it was “improbable” that there would be a big earthquake.
That meant, prosecutors17 say, that as more tremors18 hit L’Aquila in the days leading up to the quake, tens of thousands of people had been lulled19 into a false sense of security and did not evacuate20 their homes.
The earthquake reduced much of L’Aquila’s medieval(中世纪的) centre to rubble21 and flattened22 surrounding villages, leaving the region, north-east of Rome, looking like a war zone.
After a three-hour hearing, the trial was adjourned23 to Oct 1.
收听单词发音
1
devastating
|
|
| adj.毁灭性的,令人震惊的,强有力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
2
devastated
|
|
| v.彻底破坏( devastate的过去式和过去分词);摧毁;毁灭;在感情上(精神上、财务上等)压垮adj.毁坏的;极为震惊的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
3
tremor
|
|
| n.震动,颤动,战栗,兴奋,地震 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
4
defendants
|
|
| 被告( defendant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
5
prosecute
|
|
| vt.告发;进行;vi.告发,起诉,作检察官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
6
outrage
|
|
| n.暴行,侮辱,愤怒;vt.凌辱,激怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
7
accurately
|
|
| adv.准确地,精确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
8
unprecedented
|
|
| adj.无前例的,新奇的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
9
competence
|
|
| n.能力,胜任,称职 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
10
prosecution
|
|
| n.起诉,告发,检举,执行,经营 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
11
alleges
|
|
| 断言,宣称,辩解( allege的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
12
generic
|
|
| adj.一般的,普通的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
13
assessment
|
|
| n.评价;评估;对财产的估价,被估定的金额 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
14
seismic
|
|
| a.地震的,地震强度的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
15
contradictory
|
|
| adj.反驳的,反对的,抗辩的;n.正反对,矛盾对立 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
16
memo
|
|
| n.照会,备忘录;便笺;通知书;规章 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
17
prosecutors
|
|
| 检举人( prosecutor的名词复数 ); 告发人; 起诉人; 公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
18
tremors
|
|
| 震颤( tremor的名词复数 ); 战栗; 震颤声; 大地的轻微震动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
19
lulled
|
|
| vt.使镇静,使安静(lull的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
20
evacuate
|
|
| v.遣送;搬空;抽出;排泄;大(小)便 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
21
rubble
|
|
| n.(一堆)碎石,瓦砾 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
22
flattened
|
|
| [医](水)平扁的,弄平的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
23
adjourned
|
|
| (使)休会, (使)休庭( adjourn的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|