为何有些植物的光合作用较强？

Even on the evolutionary¹ time scale of tens of millions of years there is such a thing as being in the right shape at the right time. An anatomical（解剖的） difference in the ability to seize the moment, according to a study led by Brown University biologists, explains why more species in one broad group, or clade（进化枝）, of grasses evolved a more efficient means of photosynthesis² than species in another clade did. Their findings appear this week in the Proceedings³ of the National Academy of Sciences.

 

Biologists refer to the grasses that have evolved this better means of making their food in warm, sunny and dry conditions with the designation "C4." Grasses without that trait are labeled "C3."

 

What scientists had already known is that while all of the grasses in the BEP and PACMAD clades have the basic metabolic⁴ infrastructure⁵ to become C4 grasses, the species that have actually done so are entirely⁶ in the PACMAD clade. A four-nation group of scientists wondered why that disparity（不同，不一致） exists.

 

To find out, Brown postdoctoral researcher and lead author Pascal-Antoine Christin spent two years closely examining the cellular⁷ anatomy⁸ of 157 living species of BEP and PACMAD grasses. Using genetic⁹ data the team also organized the species into their evolutionary tree, which they then used to infer the anatomical traits of ancestral grasses that no longer exist today, a common analytical¹⁰ technique known as ancestral state reconstruction¹¹. That allowed them to consider how anatomical differences likely evolved among species over time.

 

Paradoxically, to understand C4 evolution, the researchers focused on the anatomy of C3 grasses in each clade.

 

In general what they found was that in the leaves of many PACMAD C3 grasses the veins¹² were closer together, and that the veins themselves were surrounded by larger cells ("bundle sheath" cells) than in BEP C3 grasses. Ultimately PACMAD grasses had a higher ratio of bundle sheath cells to mesophyll cells (cells that fill in the area between veins).

 

In C4 plants, such an anatomical arrangement facilitates a more efficient transfer and processing of CO2 in the bundle sheath cells when CO2 is in relatively¹³ short supply. When temperatures get hot or plants become stressed, they stop taking in as much CO2, creating just such a shortage within the leaf.

 

So PACMADs as a group had developed an anatomical predisposition to C4 photosynthesis（光合作用） that BEP grasses didn't, said senior author Erika Edwards, an assistant professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at Brown.

 

"We found that consistently these PACMAD C3s are very different anatomically than the C3 BEPs," she said. "We think that was the evolutionary stepping stone to C4-like physiology¹⁴."

分享到：